A new proposal put forth by the four major college conferences is aiming to enhance their authority concerning rule-making, policy decisions, and control over postseason events, particularly March Madness, according to recent reports.
This document, characterized as a “working paper” as preparations unfold for the upcoming NCAA convention, would empower the Southeastern Conference (SEC), Big Ten, Big 12, and Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) with jurisdiction over postseason championships like the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments.
These tournaments generate over $1 billion in revenue for the 1,100 NCAA member institutions, yet historically have been overseen by the NCAA itself.
The Power Four conferences already possess certain legislative privileges that distinguish them from other NCAA member leagues. They are pushing for more autonomy as disparities in revenue and prestige become increasingly apparent.
This new initiative is anticipated to establish a separate subdivision under the NCAA framework, a concept presented by NCAA President Charlie Baker back in December 2023.
His proposal suggested creating a new tier within NCAA Division I, where institutions would need to provide at least half of their student-athletes with a minimum payment of $30,000 annually through a trust fund.
Recently, the NCAA and the power conferences, which also include the Pac-12, reached a significant $2.8 billion settlement concerning antitrust allegations. This paves the way for direct payments to athletes, potentially providing up to $20.5 million per school, pending final judicial approval later this year.
SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey emphasized that the proposal is merely a starting point for dialogue as leaders across Division I reflect on a revamped governance structure.
“We have been engaged in discussions regarding the NCAA governance decision-making process for the past seven to eight months,” Sankey remarked.
“Our aim is to develop comprehensive ideas. We have shared this proposal among our conferences and informed the NCAA president. This is a critical moment for transformation, and we believe it is essential to stimulate thoughtful conversation.”
Sankey, who sits on the Division I Decision Making Group, is involved in deliberations concerning adjustments to the NCAA governance framework amidst the shift toward a more professionalized athletic landscape.
ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips, who is also a member of the NCAA’s Board of Governors, is optimistic about creating a governance model that is compatible with contemporary college athletics.
Brett Yormark, the Big 12 commissioner, described the proposal as part of a comprehensive reassessment of the entire college athletics model. He views this as a key modification that would grant more authority to the leading leagues.
“We don’t intend to undermine the unique qualities of college athletics,” Yormark stated in a recent communication.
“Rather, we seek to implement essential adjustments that align with the direction the industry is heading.”
