PHOENIX — In the wake of Donald Trump’s reelection to a second term, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs visited the Mexican border with intentions of fostering dialogue. Recognizing border security as a critical issue during Trump’s campaign, she expressed a willingness to collaborate with the new administration to address Arizona’s diverse needs.
Back in Phoenix, Attorney General Kris Mayes was actively developing a legal strategy against the Trump administration that has resulted in five lawsuits since she assumed office, averaging one every ten days. Both Hobbs and Mayes, Democrats gearing up for reelection in a state won by Trump, have adopted markedly different approaches to coping with Trump’s return to power: Hobbs opts for cooperation and dialogue, while Mayes embraces a more combative stance.
Their divergent strategies mirror an ongoing debate among Democrats nationwide on how to reclaim influence amid shifting political landscapes. Trump’s success with working-class voters has challenged traditional alliances and left Democrats seeking viable strategies to form a functional coalition. Arizona’s leading officials are each banking on distinct voter preferences for the upcoming election. Both narrowly secured their positions in 2022, with Mayes achieving the narrowest win in state history and Hobbs prevailing by less than a percentage point.
Mayes, in a recent discussion, stressed the importance of confronting authoritarian tendencies she perceives in the White House. She emphasized the gravity of the current national crisis, drawing comparisons to the Civil War. Governor Hobbs was unavailable for comment, though her team underscored her commitment to bipartisan efforts and pragmatic policymaking. Nicole DeMont, Hobbs’ chief strategist, emphasized the governor’s intent to transcend partisan politics when it benefits Arizona.
Their approaches are informed by their respective responsibilities. Hobbs, as governor, must collaborate with a Republican-friendly legislature and work with the federal government for possible assistance. In contrast, as attorney general, Mayes can pursue legal avenues. Additionally, Mayes is overseeing prosecutions of Trump affiliates involved in efforts to challenge the 2020 election outcome.
A similar pattern is observed in Michigan, where Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel aggressively opposes the Trump administration, whereas Governor Gretchen Whitmer adopts a more measured approach. This dynamic is also visible in California, where Governor Gavin Newsom sometimes cooperates with Republicans, while Attorney General Rob Bonta pursues litigation against Trump’s policies.
Even prior to the election, Hobbs and Mayes exhibited different strategies; Mayes often aligned with Democrat Kamala Harris, whereas Hobbs maintained a certain distance. Since Trump took office, Mayes has been active legally, challenging policies like a proposed end to birthright citizenship and federal funding freezes. Her continued legal efforts and public engagements suggest a commitment to resisting initiatives she perceives as problematic.
The differing stances of Hobbs and Mayes highlight the broader debate within the party. While Mayes’ actions resonate with some, not all Democratic constituents share her combative understanding. Many Arizonans, according to Mayes, favor assertive leadership that defends their interests and the Constitution, comparable to the enduring popularity of figures like the late Senator John McCain.
The upcoming elections will be pivotal in determining whether Mayes’ assertive approach or Hobbs’ collaborative method aligns better with the electorate’s expectations. The unfolding political climate suggests it will be a critical test of their strategic choices.
