Alternative for Germany, commonly referred to as AfD, has emerged as a prominent entity within the political landscape since its inception 12 years ago. Despite its growing influence, the party has yet to secure a role in any state or national government. This lack of presence is attributed to a so-called “firewall” designed to exclude the anti-immigrant, far-right group from governance.
Other political parties have made it clear that they refuse to collaborate with AfD, which is currently under scrutiny by the domestic intelligence services due to perceived connections to right-wing extremism. The party vehemently contests these claims. In three eastern German states, the party’s factions have been labeled as “proven right-wing extremist” organizations, a classification that is particularly sensitive in light of Germany’s historical context regarding the Nazi regime.
This dynamic necessitates unusual political coalitions among other parties that aim to keep AfD from obtaining power. A visible example of this is found in Thuringia, where a coalition spanning various ideological lines was formed to govern after AfD became the leading party in a regional election held in September.
Recent political maneuvering has raised questions about whether Friedrich Merz, the leader of Germany’s conservative opposition, has crossed established boundaries. He faced criticism for allegedly breaching the firewall after introducing a nonbinding resolution that advocated for an increase in border refusals for migrants. This measure was narrowly passed, with support from AfD members, marking a significant moment in the political climate of post-World War II Germany.
Following this, another proposal put forth by the opposition, aimed at instituting stricter immigration regulations, was narrowly defeated in parliament. Had it passed, it would have received backing from AfD, triggering substantial protests in response. Merz has maintained that he remains steadfast in his stance, asserting that he will not work with AfD, will not enter into a coalition government with them, and has not engaged in negotiations regarding their motions or legislation.
