In the wake of President-elect Donald Trump’s controversial remarks about potentially using military force to take control of Greenland, Denmark has privately reached out to his team to discuss alternative ways to address U.S. security concerns, according to Axios.
Two sources familiar with the matter revealed that messages were sent offering to boost security measures in Greenland or expand the U.S. military presence on the island.
Why It Matters
Trump’s refusal to rule out military action against Greenland — an autonomous territory under Danish defense jurisdiction — has alarmed Denmark, a close NATO ally, and shocked European capitals. The idea of claiming Greenland as U.S. territory has been widely criticized, with Danish officials seeking to de-escalate tensions and address security concerns through dialogue.
Greenland’s Strategic Importance
Greenland, home to only 56,000 people, plays a critical role in Arctic geopolitics. As the world’s largest island, it is vital for U.S. national security, especially in countering Russian and Chinese influence. Climate change has made the Arctic more accessible, opening up competition for mineral resources and strategic sea lanes.
Trump has frequently underscored Greenland’s importance, with his son, Don Jr., visiting the island recently and distributing MAGA hats. Meanwhile, Denmark maintains that U.S. security needs can be met without a territorial claim.
Denmark’s Diplomatic Push
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic leader Múte Egede met in Copenhagen to address the situation. Both expressed readiness to engage in discussions with Trump, emphasizing Greenland’s autonomy. Egede firmly stated, “Greenland is for the Greenlandic people. We do not want to be Danish, we do not want to be American. We want to be Greenlandic.”
Denmark’s government has communicated to Trump’s advisers that while Greenland is not for sale, they are open to bolstering military infrastructure and capabilities on the island. The U.S. already has a military base there and operates under a 1951 defense agreement with Denmark, making expanded cooperation feasible.
Historical Context and Rising Stakes
Greenland’s strategic location made it a key Cold War asset for NATO and U.S. defense, particularly as an early warning system against Soviet threats. With the Arctic becoming more navigable, its value is increasing. Experts argue that U.S. security concerns can be addressed by enhancing existing agreements rather than pursuing ownership.
Trump’s Stance Sparks Uncertainty
While Secretary of State Antony Blinken downplayed Trump’s remarks, calling them impractical, the president-elect’s repeated comments and his son’s visit suggest he may be serious. Danish and Greenlandic officials are now grappling with whether Trump is open to a security-focused deal or seeking to make history by acquiring new U.S. territory.
What’s Next?
The Danish government is working to avoid a public dispute with the incoming administration, hoping to clarify Trump’s intentions and offer practical solutions. As the Arctic gains global significance, Greenland’s role in international security and geopolitics will continue to attract attention, with Denmark striving to preserve its autonomy while strengthening alliances.
