A dynamic and engaging banner for USLIVE.com, featuring bold typography and vibrant visuals that represent the latest in breaking news, entertainment, celebrity updates, lifestyle trends, and current events. Designed to keep readers informed 24/7 with the most relevant and up-to-date stories.

Understanding ‘Price Gouging’ and Vice President Harris’ Push to Prohibit It

Vice President Kamala Harris recently proposed a ban on “price gouging” by food suppliers and grocery stores, aiming to alleviate concerns over high grocery prices and inflation. Under the Biden-Harris administration, grocery prices have risen by 21%, contributing to an overall 19% increase in costs that has impacted Americans’ view of the economy. While wages have increased since the pandemic, many still struggle with higher expenses.

Price gouging usually occurs following supply disruptions like natural disasters when retailers sharply raise prices, particularly for necessities. While some states have laws against price gouging, there is no federal ban in place yet. Harris’ proposal may not immediately reduce grocery prices, as it’s uncertain how much price gouging is currently happening.

Despite President Joe Biden’s statement that inflation has subsided, Harris believes high prices persist even after supply chain issues have improved. The focus on combating inflation may stem from its continued political significance, with voters often blaming corporations for causing price surges. Although prices are not rising significantly, they remain high, indicating potential profit margins for manufacturers and retailers.

Economists largely attribute the inflation to supply chain disruptions and increased demand during the pandemic rather than price gouging. Some argue that corporations took advantage of the situation, leading to what they call “seller’s inflation” or “greedflation.” Harris’ proposal, while resembling price controls from the 1970s, seeks to protect consumers by enabling investigations into sudden price spikes rather than setting fixed prices.

While some economists criticize Harris’ approach as overly interventionist, others see it as a necessary consumer protection measure to prevent exploitation by corporations seeking to take advantage of market disruptions. The proposal doesn’t set specific prices but allows the Federal Trade Commission to probe instances of price spikes. Despite differing opinions, the proposal reflects ongoing efforts to address concerns about rising costs and inflation impacting American households.

A dynamic and engaging banner for USLIVE.com, featuring bold typography and vibrant visuals that represent the latest in breaking news, entertainment, celebrity updates, lifestyle trends, and current events. Designed to keep readers informed 24/7 with the most relevant and up-to-date stories.
TOP HEADLINES

Namibia Farewells Founding Leader Sam Nujoma

In the early hours of a Saturday morning, Namibia gathered to honor the life...

Japan’s PM Nervous at Fashion Show Appearance

TOKYO — Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba traded his trademark suit for a trendier...

Global Impact of USAID Reductions: 20 Projects Ended

DAKAR, Senegal — The global community is grappling with the repercussions of the Trump...

Pope recovers, enjoys coffee after breathing issue

ROME — Following a concerning health episode, Pope Francis, who is recuperating from double...

Millwall Keeper Red-Carded for Face Kick in FA Cup...

LONDON – In a tension-filled FA Cup clash, Millwall's goalkeeper, Liam Roberts, was expelled...

Boston becomes new focus for border official on immigration

In the wake of Mayor Michelle Wu's upcoming congressional testimony defending Boston's policies on...