Quakers Rally Against Trump’s Immigration Policies

    0
    0

    In a spirited display of advocacy, a number of Quakers have embarked on a remarkable 300-mile trek from New York City to Washington, D.C. The purpose of this journey is to protest against the measures taken by the Trump administration regarding immigrants.

    This march comes as part of a longstanding tradition of activism within the Quaker community. Historically, Quakers have actively participated in campaigns for peace, the abolition of slavery, and women’s voting rights. More recently, the Quaker community legally challenged the federal government over immigration authorities making arrests at places of worship earlier this year.

    The protest organizers express that this march aims to publicly show support and solidarity with migrant communities and others who have been targeted by the policies of President Donald Trump’s administration. “It feels daunting to face such significant and, in some ways, existential threats,” expressed Jess Hobbs Pifer, a 25-year-old Quaker and organizer of the march. She feels tied to the long history of activism within her faith.

    Their mission is to walk south from Flushing Quaker Meeting House through New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and Pennsylvania to the U.S. Capitol. There, they intend to deliver a copy of the “Flushing Remonstrance,” a 17th-century document advocating for religious freedom and countering bans on Quaker worship, showing its ongoing relevance in advocating universal acceptance.

    Max Goodman, a Quaker who is part of the march, mentioned, “There’s a commonality between how the administration disregards constitutional norms and ideals of equality.” He also remarked that despite adhering to the law superficially, the administration undermines the spirit of pluralism and human dignity foundational to America’s ethos.

    Quakers, officially known as the Religious Society of Friends, began in 17th-century England, spearheaded by George Fox. Reacting against the ceremonial Anglican Church, Fox emphasized a personal connection to the divine, nurturing what he described as the Inner Light, freeing adherents from strict ecclesiastical rituals. Despite facing legal challenges for opposing established churches, Fox, renamed ‘quaker’ mockingly, stood firm in religious debates.

    Throughout history, Quakers have demonstrated against wars and supported civil liberties, such as the abolition of slavery and suffrage. Ross Brubeck, a Quaker march organizer, noted the inherent nature of Quakers to actively challenge authority and influence over oppressive practices in the U.S. since its founding. Participants continue to align themselves with contemporary movements—like the Seattle WTO protests or those following George Floyd’s death—to speak against injustices.

    After a portion of their journey, they were graciously received by local Quakers in Princeton, who commended their perseverance. “I was humbled by their presence, acknowledging the arduous journey they’ve taken,” said Casey Oware of the Princeton Friends Meeting. Her fellow participant, Marae McGhee, admired their commitment amidst trying times.

    Quaker beliefs can vary significantly, from Bible-centered Christianity with distinct pastoral figures to more liberal, unstructured forms of worship. Among the noteworthy historical figures, William Penn, founded Pennsylvania rooted in religious tolerance, while other members faced vilification for their anti-war stance. Their adherence to pacifism saw them persecuted, yet resilient in spreading their beliefs.

    Earlier in the year, multiple Quaker congregations took legal action against a Trump administration directive granting immigration officers increased authority to make arrests in religiously sensitive locations. This lawsuit was supported by several other religious groups, yet it faced a setback with an unfavorable federal ruling just a month ago.

    Trump’s presidential narrative underscored immigrants as a fundamental threat, a sentiment that resonated with many. As immigration rose sharply under President Biden, Trump’s administration challenged this influx through assertive enforcement measures, at times overreaching executive power. This action encountered judicial checks seeking to restrain excesses.

    “Immigrants are the most acutely persecuted demographics right now,” declared Brubeck. “The message to Trump is unequivocal: the power to oppress is not yours.”