In the first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, his administration has set a distinctive tone that prioritizes dismantling existing policies.
While his supporters see this as a revival of America through assertive executive actions, critics argue that such measures could undermine constitutional principles and risk economic stability. From dramatic increases in tariffs to significant reductions in the federal workforce, Trump’s administration touts these as key achievements.
However, opponents express concerns about the potential economic repercussions and constitutional conflicts these actions may provoke.
During this period, Trump has issued approximately 140 executive orders, matching nearly the same number signed by his predecessor, Joe Biden, over four years. While the volume is notable, more significant is the reach of these orders. Bypassing Congress, Trump has imposed substantial import taxes and authorized extensive federal workforce reductions.
This approach represents a bold assertion of presidential power that’s seen as more contentious than the actions of previous administrations, such as Biden’s student loan policies or Obama’s immigration reforms.
A central element of Trump’s strategy has been aggressive trade policies, notably imposing a 145% tariff on China. This move has sparked tensions, as China retaliated with a 125% tariff on U.S. goods. Public assurances of ongoing talks with China have been contradicted by Chinese officials, leaving the prospects for a resolution unclear. Despite this, Trump anticipates that tariffs will generate sufficient revenue to enable tax cuts, although experts caution that these measures could escalate into a broader trade conflict.
Internationally, Trump’s approach to foreign conflicts has attracted significant scrutiny. His administration’s proposal for Ukraine to accept Russian control over Crimea has been rejected outright by Ukraine. Despite four meetings between Trump’s envoy and Russian President Vladimir Putin, progress toward a diplomatic solution remains elusive.
Recent violence in Ukraine suggests that peace may not be imminent, as Trump himself has indicated frustrations with persuading Putin to conclude the conflict.
In the Middle East, Trump’s attempts at negotiating peace have seen mixed results. Initially hailed for brokering a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict, the agreement has since collapsed, with significant Palestinian casualties reported since then. Trump’s subsequent proposal to relocate Palestinians and redevelop the Gaza Strip has been met with widespread condemnation.
Domestically, the administration’s focus on government efficiency has involved significant downsizing, with an estimated 280,000 federal jobs cut or affected by freezes. This initiative, led by adviser Elon Musk, aims to streamline government operations but faces criticism over potential disruptions to public services.
Additional reductions are planned, particularly affecting organizations reliant on federal funding.
On immigration, Trump’s administration deported 139,000 individuals found unlawfully present in the U.S., with border crossing incidents sharply reduced. Nonetheless, deportations have sparked legal battles, especially where individuals face unsanctioned removal.
Courts have sometimes intervened, ordering the return of deportees like Kilmar Abrego Garcia, emphasizing due process concerns. Trump, however, stands firm on his deportation policies as central to his election mandate, expressing frustration with judicial interventions slowing enforcement efforts.