A dynamic and engaging banner for USLIVE.com, featuring bold typography and vibrant visuals that represent the latest in breaking news, entertainment, celebrity updates, lifestyle trends, and current events. Designed to keep readers informed 24/7 with the most relevant and up-to-date stories.

Trump administration retracts backing for transgender youth in Tennessee Supreme Court case

WASHINGTON — The federal government has withdrawn its support for transgender youth and their families in Tennessee who are contesting a state law prohibiting gender-affirming care, according to a recent communication to the Supreme Court from the Trump administration.

During December’s court proceedings, it became evident that the conservative justices were inclined to uphold the state’s prohibition on puberty blockers and hormone treatments. This official communication marks yet another significant action taken by the new administration in relation to transgender issues. Just two weeks into his presidency, President Trump enacted an executive order that halted federal funding for gender-affirming medical care for individuals under the age of 19.

The Tennessee law, referred to as SB1, mirrors similar legislation enacted in about half of the states, which restricts access to gender-affirming treatment for minors. While the Biden administration previously engaged in the Tennessee case, arguing that such restrictions constitute unconstitutional discrimination based on sex and could inspire similar limitations on transgender adults, the current administration’s stance has shifted.

In a letter to the Supreme Court, Deputy Solicitor General Curtis Gannon stated, “The Department has now determined that SB1 does not deny equal protection based on sex or any other characteristic.” He further asserted that the new administration would have refrained from challenging SB1 if it had been in office at the time and expressed the belief that the justices should still proceed with deliberating the case. This is attributed to the involvement of transgender youth and their parents, which would make it inefficient to require additional legal submissions.

In response, attorneys representing the families expressed their disappointment, stating, “This latest move from the Trump administration is another indication that they are using the power of the federal government to target marginalized groups for further discrimination,” as per a statement from Lambda Legal and the American Civil Liberties Union.

A ruling from the Supreme Court is anticipated no later than early summer. Since assuming office again last month, Trump has enacted policies that define gender as immutable, potentially pave the way for restricting transgender individuals from military service, call for revised educational guidelines regarding gender, and lay the groundwork for preventing transgender women and girls from participating in female sports. Several of these initiatives are already facing legal challenges.

author avatar
@USLive
A dynamic and engaging banner for USLIVE.com, featuring bold typography and vibrant visuals that represent the latest in breaking news, entertainment, celebrity updates, lifestyle trends, and current events. Designed to keep readers informed 24/7 with the most relevant and up-to-date stories.
TOP HEADLINES

Breaking News: Pentagon plans to send approximately 1,500 additional...

The Pentagon has announced plans to send approximately 1,500 additional active-duty soldiers to the...

White Sox sign infielder Brandon Drury to a minor...

The Chicago White Sox have signed infielder Brandon Drury to a minor league contract,...

Indiana head coach Mike Woodson will not be back...

Indiana head coach Mike Woodson has decided to resign from his position at the...

Woman charged with theft from deceased TV reporter discovered...

NEW ORLEANS — Authorities are probing the circumstances surrounding the death of a television...

A federal judge considers the possibility of restricting DOGE’s...

In Washington, D.C., a federal judge conducted hearings on Friday regarding a motion to...

North Carolina judge’s decision upholds tight electoral outcome, but...

RALEIGH, N.C. — A trial judge in North Carolina confirmed the decisions made by...