Home Sport live NFL Cleveland considers invoking ‘Modell Law’ to prevent Browns from relocating and playing in planned dome.

Cleveland considers invoking ‘Modell Law’ to prevent Browns from relocating and playing in planned dome.

0
Cleveland considers invoking ‘Modell Law’ to prevent Browns from relocating and playing in planned dome.

CLEVELAND — The Cleveland Browns’ ambitions to relocate and establish a new domed stadium have encountered significant challenges.
Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb has reached out to team owners Dee and Jimmy Haslam through a letter, indicating that the city plans to enforce the “Modell Law” to prevent the franchise from moving away from its current lakefront venue. The existing lease is scheduled to end in 2028.

In his correspondence, Bibb has requested a response from the Browns by January 9 and warned that failure to comply could lead the city to “take appropriate legal action.”
The Modell Law, enacted in 1996 in the wake of former Browns owner Art Modell’s controversial move to Baltimore, mandates that no Ohio team that plays in a taxpayer-funded stadium can relocate without either reaching an agreement with the host city or providing a six-month notice before any potential move, coupled with an option for the city to purchase the team.

Previously, the Browns initiated a federal lawsuit to seek clarification on this law, but this case remains unresolved.
In their reply to Bibb, the Browns expressed that the law and the city’s stance contribute to uncertainty and do not align with the best interests of the Greater Cleveland area.

This latest move by the city adds to a contentious ongoing dispute between the Browns and local government.
The Haslams, who have owned the franchise since 2012, are aiming to construct a $2.4 billion domed stadium along with a surrounding entertainment district in Brook Park, approximately 10 miles south of downtown Cleveland. Their proposal includes a shared financial partnership with the city and county to fund the project.

On the other hand, city officials have suggested covering half of the renovation expenses for the existing 65,000-seat stadium, which opened in 1999 as part of Cleveland’s NFL expansion.
The Haslams have countered that simply refurbishing the current facility will not address larger issues related to parking, access, and overall fan experience. They maintain that a new dome would facilitate regional growth by enhancing the city’s ability to attract significant events, including major sports competitions and concerts.