Home World Live International Crisis Authority for federal officials to monitor and deactivate drones at risk of lapsing amid budget dispute

Authority for federal officials to monitor and deactivate drones at risk of lapsing amid budget dispute

0

As the intrigue surrounding reported drone sightings in the eastern United States, particularly New Jersey, continues, concerns have arisen regarding the expiration of federal powers aimed at tracking and disabling unmanned aircraft identified as potential threats. This authority is set to lapse after Friday, and the temporary spending bill currently under consideration in Congress—which would extend these powers—remains uncertain.

In response to security concerns, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) imposed a temporary ban on drone flights in 22 critical areas of New Jersey as of Wednesday. These restrictions, effective until January 17, were initiated at the request of federal security agencies to ensure the protection of vital infrastructure in the state.

Authorities at both federal and local levels have been probing the reported drone sightings. However, officials have indicated that there is no evidence to suggest these drones have posed a risk to national security or public safety. Many of the sightings, they noted, have turned out to be legitimate drones, regular aircraft, helicopters, or even celestial objects such as stars.

Within a bipartisan measure aimed at preventing a government shutdown, there is a provision that seeks to prolong the authority of the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice. This extension would enable them to monitor and counter unmanned aircraft considered a credible threat from December 20 until March 14. Experts and homeland security officials stress the importance of this authority for addressing potentially hazardous drones in the proximity of military installations, presidential locations, national borders, prisons, and significant events such as New Year’s celebrations and the Super Bowl.

However, the fate of this temporary spending bill, which includes the much-needed reauthorization, faced a setback on Wednesday when President-elect Donald Trump unexpectedly dismissed the proposal, urging Republicans to renegotiate it just days before federal funding is set to expire. Congress was still striving on Thursday to finalize a bill that would prevent a government shutdown.

It remains uncertain what implications might arise should this authority lapse, particularly concerning the drone detection systems that the federal government has established in states like New Jersey, where multiple drone sightings have occurred. The office of New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy directed inquiries regarding these detection systems to officials in the Department of Homeland Security.

On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security refrained from commenting on the imminent expiration of drone tracking authority. Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, along with various officials from the Biden administration and both parties in Congress, has consistently advocated for the reauthorization and enhancement of the authority governing counter-unmanned aerial systems (C-UAS).

Mayorkas emphasized to the House Homeland Security Committee in November 2023, “It is crucial that we do not allow these existing authorities to lapse, as it is central to our mission to protect the president and vice president, manage designated areas along the Southwest Border, secure federal facilities, and ensure public safety. A pause in DHS’s C-UAS authority would pose considerable risks to our homeland security, forcing DHS to halt or limit ongoing operations.”

Legislation in both the House and Senate designed to prolong and expand federal drone authority remains under consideration. Notably, these proposals would permit state and local agencies, for the first time, to track and incapacitate dangerous drones through a pilot initiative governed by federal authorities.

On Wednesday, efforts by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, to expedite the Senate’s move on the bill were thwarted when Senator Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, objected. Paul raised concerns about the urgency and necessity for action, questioning whether there is sufficient evidence to substantiate a genuine threat from drones.