BOSTON — A second federal judge has intervened by issuing a temporary order to halt the Trump administration’s initiative to freeze federal funding.

This ruling follows a similar decision made by another judge who also expressed concerns about the administration’s actions, indicating that they may be overstepping legal boundaries.

The administration has been trying to implement measures that would cut off financial support to certain jurisdictions, raising alarms among local leaders about the potential consequences for public services and programs.

The judges’ decisions reflect broader challenges facing the administration in its attempts to influence local governance through financial incentives or penalties.

As the situation unfolds, many are closely watching how these legal battles will affect federal funding and local administrations across various regions.

The implications of this ruling may resonate beyond immediate funding issues, possibly setting a precedent for future interactions between federal authorities and state or local entities.

Legal experts anticipate more rulings may emerge as this situation develops, especially if the administration continues to push forward with its funding policies.

Overall, the temporary injunctions highlight the ongoing tension and complexities in the relationship between federal and local governments during this administrational period.