The recent nomination of Florida Representative Matt Gaetz as President-elect Donald Trump’s attorney general has sparked significant dissent among Republican members of the House. Gaetz’s controversial reputation, marked by a failed attempt to remove former Speaker Kevin McCarthy and his past involvement in a federal investigation regarding alleged sexual misconduct with a minor—though ultimately closed without charges—has left some colleagues apprehensive about the potential cabinet appointment. Gaetz has consistently denied any wrongdoing related to the investigation.
As discussions unfolded over the course of Wednesday and Thursday, some Republicans expressed hesitance yet noted Gaetz’s long-standing support for Trump, highlighting his dedication to the former president’s agenda. Gaetz has actively campaigned for Trump, solidifying his position within the party, but his past actions have strained relationships with some Republican lawmakers.
Several prominent party members weighed in on Gaetz’s nomination:
Rep. Don Bacon from Nebraska summarized his distaste succinctly, stating, “I was told growing up that if you don’t have anything good to say, don’t say anything at all.”
Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton was particularly harsh, labeling Gaetz’s nomination as “the worst” for a Cabinet role in U.S. history, criticizing both his qualifications and character.
Senator Susan Collins of Maine acknowledged the president’s authority to nominate, emphasizing the Senate’s essential role in evaluating such appointments. She anticipated extensive inquiry during Gaetz’s confirmation hearing, should it proceed.
Senator John Cornyn from Texas commented, “We’ll handle it like any other nomination,” suggesting an open-minded approach. Meanwhile, senator Kevin Cramer from North Dakota described the nomination as a “test,” alluding to Gaetz’s uphill battle for confirmation.
Senator Lindsey Graham from South Carolina stated his inclination to support presidential choices while recognizing that Gaetz would face rigorous questioning during hearings.
Senate GOP leader John Thune indicated that inquiries surrounding Gaetz should be directed to the Committee Chairman, while Iowa’s Chuck Grassley, a potential chair himself, noted his lack of familiarity with Gaetz, suggesting that he would need to investigate further.
House Speaker Mike Johnson from Louisiana praised Gaetz as one of the “most intelligent” members of Congress, arguing that he could contribute significantly to the administration.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna from Florida defended Gaetz’s strategic efforts in his campaign against Kevin McCarthy, countering the perception of him as merely a provocateur.
Senator Markwayne Mullin from Oklahoma acknowledged their past disagreements but expressed trust in Trump’s decision, stating that Gaetz would need to demonstrate his qualifications during Senate hearings.
In contrast, Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska conveyed skepticism about Gaetz’s viability as a candidate, reinforcing that while the president has the right to nominate, the Senate’s consent capacity is critical.
Yet, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, who has a longstanding friendship with Gaetz, expressed confidence in his abilities, asserting he would perform well in the role.
Rep. Mike Simpson from Idaho conveyed surprise at the announcement, casting doubt on Gaetz’s ability to secure Senate confirmation.
Finally, Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina conjectured that Gaetz would struggle to garner the requisite votes but anticipated a lively confirmation process, given Gaetz’s contentious history with some Senate members.
As the situation continues to develop, the Republican party remains deeply divided over Gaetz’s potential role in the Trump administration.
