Tennessee’s Republican leaders have issued a warning to Memphis, threatening to withhold substantial state funding if the city proceeds with plans to include three gun control measures on the November ballot. These initiatives, approved by Memphis’ city council earlier this year, aim to amend the city charter to require handgun permits, ban AR-15 rifles, and enforce a “red flag” law allowing the seizure of firearms from individuals deemed dangerous.
Despite acknowledging potential conflicts with Tennessee’s lenient gun laws, council members from Memphis have expressed a willingness to push forward with the ballot measures, emphasizing the importance of allowing citizens to voice their opinions on gun control issues. The Republican-controlled Legislature had previously passed laws allowing permitless carry for handguns and prohibiting local red flag laws.
In response to Memphis’ defiance, House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Senate Speaker Randy McNally cautioned the city about the repercussions of contradicting state legislation. Secretary of State Tre Hargett also warned that Memphis would not receive approval for its ballot if the gun initiatives were included, citing the inability of local governments to bypass state laws.
Memphis is at risk of losing nearly $78 million in state sales tax revenue, a significant portion of its $858 million budget, if it proceeds with the contested ballot measures. Mayor Paul Young emphasized the need for collaboration between the city and the state to address gun-related issues and maintain community safety, ultimately leaving the decision in the hands of voters and legislative bodies.
Recent crime statistics released by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation show a decrease in reported crime rates in Memphis during the first half of 2024 compared to the previous year, with significant reductions in violent crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. However, trust between Memphis and the state government has been strained by disagreements over police reforms and legislative interventions in local ordinances, leading to increasing tensions between city leaders and white-majority legislators.
