Key Point Summary โ White House Rose Garden Redesign
- New photos show the Rose Gardenโs central lawn has been paved over
- Trump says the lawn caused issues for events and high heels
- Critics call the redesign a destruction of JFK-era history
- Melaniaโs 2020 renovation already faced major public backlash
- Final completion expected by August 2025 with National Park Service
- Trumpโs gilded Oval Office also drawing viral attention
- Supporters say changes improve function, critics call them garish
Trumpโs Patio Vision Replaces Kennedyโs Green Legacy
The White House Rose Garden is no longer the lush, iconic landscape it once was. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump are now overseeing the final stages of a massive renovation that replaces the grass lawn with concrete. The change, first visible in a July 22 photo, shows an expansive patio now dominating the area once reserved for JFKโs beloved lawn.
Trump defended the drastic shift in a Fox News interview, saying the natural grass posed problems during press events. โWomen with high heels were sinking,โ he said, calling the redesign a practical necessity rather than an aesthetic choice.
A โRestorationโ or a Redesign?
The administration has labeled the overhaul a โrestoration.โ A White House official told PEOPLE that the project builds on Melaniaโs 2020 changes, with an emphasis on usability and guest comfort. But critics say the Trumps are rewriting White House history under the guise of modernization.
The new construction is being funded by the Trust for the National Mall and managed by the National Park Service. Itโs expected to be finished by mid-August 2025, though its public reception remains up for debate.
Melaniaโs 2020 Garden Makeover Still Haunts Headlines
This isnโt the first time Melania Trump has courted controversy with the Rose Garden. In 2020, she faced backlash for removing vibrant flower beds and adding a limestone border, which many viewed as cold and sterile. NBC historian Michael Beschloss called the changes โgrimโ and accused her of erasing decades of American heritage.
Melaniaโs office clapped back online, accusing Beschloss of โignoranceโ and sharing photos of the garden in full bloom. The former first lady emphasized her commitment to improving the space, noting that drainage issues and lack of sunlight had left just 12 healthy rose bushes before her redesign. She planted 200 new ones to revitalize the area.
Concrete Over Charm? Critics Are Divided
This latest transformation takes the controversy to a new level. Removing the lawn entirely in favor of stone has some Americans accusing the Trumps of prioritizing vanity over legacy. Others applaud the change as a functional update that reflects a more modern presidency.
But the stark contrast to previous administrationsโespecially the understated designs of Barack Obama and Joe Bidenโis hard to ignore. Critics say Trumpโs flashier instincts are on full display.
Gilded Oval Office Adds to Gold-Heavy Headlines
The Rose Garden isnโt the only place where Trump is leaving a golden imprint. In April, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump hired his personal โgold guy,โ cabinetmaker John Icart, to add gold trim, carvings, and even a Trump crest to the Oval Office. Icart previously worked on Trumpโs Mar-a-Lago estate and Trump Towerโboth known for their flamboyant interiors.
The updates include a gilded fireplace mantel and framed political portraits. One doorway now gleams with a custom gold crest, symbolizing Trumpโs personal stamp on presidential tradition.
Is It Modernization or Monumental Mistake?
Supporters say the new Rose Garden layout will make the space more accessible and safer for guests. Critics argue itโs the erasure of a cherished historical site, once nurtured by presidents from Kennedy to Clinton. The debate highlights the broader cultural clash between tradition and Trumpโs trademark style.
And with the concrete now setting, both literally and politically, thereโs no turning back. The White House Rose Garden, once a symbol of elegance and presidential legacy, now stands as a slab of controversy.