Trump accussed of bypassing rule of law to limit birthright citizenship

A powerful legal blow was delivered to former President Donald Trump’s controversial attempt to redefine birthright citizenship. On Thursday, a federal judge blocked Trump’s executive order, accusing him of disregarding the rule of law to push his policy agenda.

A stinging rebuke

District Judge John C. Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee, issued the preliminary injunction in Washington state. The judge stated that the president views the rule of law as an obstacle to achieving his goals. From the bench, Coughenour emphasized, “To our president, the rule of law is an impediment, something to bypass or ignore for personal or political gain.”

He didn’t hold back. “In this courtroom, under my watch, the rule of law is a guiding light that I will follow,” Coughenour added firmly. His strong words followed a growing chorus of criticism against Trump’s executive order.

An unconstitutional attempt

Trump’s executive order sought to change the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. The president’s order aimed to strip citizenship from children born to parents who are unlawfully in the country or hold temporary status. However, Coughenour didn’t mince words: “If the government wants to alter birthright citizenship, it needs to amend the Constitution, not bypass it.”

This, according to the judge, is an unconstitutional attempt to alter the 14th Amendment under the guise of an executive order. He accused Trump of trying to skirt the legal process.

Other judges weigh in

Judge Coughenour is not the only one pushing back against Trump’s move. Just one day before Coughenour’s ruling, a second judge, Deborah L. Boardman from Maryland, also blocked the order. Boardman granted a temporary restraining order following a lawsuit from a group of 16 expecting immigrant mothers.

Boardman argued that Trump’s executive order “runs counter to our nation’s 250-year history of citizenship by birth” and is likely in violation of Supreme Court precedents. The ruling cast further doubt on Trump’s characterization of the 14th Amendment, which the Supreme Court has consistently upheld.

The importance of birthright citizenship

The 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause is crucial. It ensures that all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. are American citizens. This protection has been a cornerstone of American identity since its passage. Civil rights groups argue that Trump’s order undermines this principle, which is vital for millions of Americans.

According to the lawsuit filed by civil rights organizations, if Trump’s order were allowed to take effect, children born in the U.S. could be denied fundamental rights, including passports and Social Security numbers. This could prevent them from traveling, working, and receiving critical benefits and protections as citizens.

A long history of precedent

The 14th Amendment was specifically written to ensure that no one, not even the president, could deny children born in the United States their rightful citizenship. Civil rights groups point to this history to highlight the significance of the ruling against Trump’s executive order.

Trump’s battle with the constitution

Trump’s executive order has sparked a heated legal battle across the country. Several lawsuits are challenging the president’s attempt to redefine birthright citizenship. Legal experts and advocates believe this order represents a blatant disregard for the Constitution and its protections.

Judge Coughenour has made it clear that he sees the president’s order as unconstitutional. “This is a clear case,” he said. “There’s no need for further debate.”

As the legal case continues, it’s clear that Trump’s controversial order faces significant hurdles. The fight over birthright citizenship is not over, but for now, the rule of law stands tall. The injunction has temporarily blocked the order, but the legal challenges are far from finished.

The fate of Trump’s executive order now lies in the hands of the courts. But with strong opposition from legal experts and advocates for immigrant rights, it’s unclear whether the president’s attempt to undermine the 14th Amendment will ever succeed.

A win for immigrant families

For now, families across the U.S. can breathe a sigh of relief. The legal victory is a win for immigrant families, ensuring that children born in America continue to have their birthright citizenship protected.

As the battle unfolds, all eyes will remain on the courts to see if Trump’s push to redefine birthright citizenship will stand up to legal scrutiny. For now, the rule of law has triumphed.