A federal jury ruled that the New York Times did not libel Sarah Palin in a defamation case. This decision comes after a long legal battle, stemming from a 2017 editorial. The editorial linked Palin to a mass shooting in 2011. That tragic event injured Congresswoman Gabby Giffords and killed six others. Sarah Palin loses this defamation case that she filed, claiming the editorial falsely connected her to the shooting. The jury’s ruling ends this chapter of the lawsuit.

The Editorial and Defamation Claims

The New York Times published the editorial after a 2017 shooting at a Republican congressional baseball practice. The attack severely injured Rep. Steve Scalise. The editorial linked Palin to the 2011 mass shooting and drew heavy criticism. Palin’s legal team argued that the editorial defamed her. They claimed it suggested she was responsible for the violence that occurred in 2011.

The jury deliberated for two hours after hearing both sides’ closing arguments. They reviewed the evidence carefully before making their decision. The trial had lasted for two weeks. In the end, the jury concluded that Palin’s defamation claims were not valid. The New York Times had not acted with malice or intent to harm Palin’s reputation. Thus, Sarah Palin loses her case and the Times is cleared once again.

The New York Times Responds

Danielle Rhoades, a spokesperson for the New York Times, responded to the jury’s decision. She expressed gratitude to the jurors for their careful deliberations. She emphasized that the decision reaffirmed an important principle in American law. Publishers are not held liable for honest mistakes. This ruling is a victory for the Times, reinforcing that media outlets should not face legal consequences for accidental errors.

Palin’s Potential Appeal

Palin’s legal team was contacted for a response. However, it is unclear whether she will appeal the decision. The option to appeal remains open. A decision to appeal could prolong the legal battle. For now, though, the jury’s ruling stands as the final word in the case. Sarah Palin loses her bid, but may still have the option to contest the ruling.

Background: Palin and the 2011 Mass Shooting

Sarah Palin rose to national fame after John McCain chose her as his Republican vice-presidential running mate in 2008. In 2017, she sued the New York Times for defamation. Her lawsuit targeted an editorial that connected her to the 2011 mass shooting. That attack in Tucson, Arizona, severely wounded Gabby Giffords and killed six others. Many critics called the editorial a major mistake by the Times.

The Editorial’s Correction and Apology

The New York Times acted quickly to correct the editorial. The day after its publication, the paper issued a correction. James Bennet, the former editorial page editor, took responsibility for the error. He admitted that the story was rushed and apologized for the mistake. Bennet’s apology was part of the evidence in the trial. He testified tearfully, acknowledging the harm caused to Palin’s reputation.

Previous Legal Rulings in the Case

This case doesn’t mark the first time a jury cleared the New York Times of libel accusations from Palin. In 2022, a federal jury sided with the newspaper. U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff dismissed the case earlier, but he expected an appeal. The 2022 ruling gave the Times a legal win. Still, the legal battle continued.

Appeals Court Overturns the Ruling

In 2024, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Judge Rakoff’s ruling. The appellate court ordered a retrial of the case. The court found that the earlier dismissal of the case could have influenced the jury. The appeals court believed that the jury would have been affected if they knew the judge had already ruled in favor of the New York Times.

The lawsuit is still ongoing, but this latest jury decision could signal the end of the case. Palin’s legal team may choose to appeal, but the legal process could take more time. The case has been through several rounds of litigation, with the New York Times ultimately found not liable for defamation. This ruling marks a significant moment in the long-running legal battle between Palin and the Times where Sarah Palin loses once again.