Home World International Crisis Latest from the Middle East: Palestinians assert that Trump’s Gaza plan breaches international law

Latest from the Middle East: Palestinians assert that Trump’s Gaza plan breaches international law

0
Latest from the Middle East: Palestinians assert that Trump’s Gaza plan breaches international law

Palestinians, along with their supporters and various countries, expressed fierce opposition to President Donald Trump’s proposal for the United States to “take over” the Gaza Strip and permanently resettle its inhabitants. Trump voiced this idea during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who appeared supportive as Trump described plans for new Palestinian settlements outside Gaza. The U.S. would supposedly take “ownership” of the area, rejuvenating it into what Trump referred to as “the Riviera of the Middle East.”

Trump noted, “We’ll take charge of Gaza and manage it effectively. We’ll be responsible for removing any lingering unexploded ordnance and other weapons, clear out the wreckage, and develop economic opportunities to create abundant jobs.” His suggestions were met with immediate backlash from both allies and adversaries. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas called for the United Nations to protect the rights of Palestinian people, declaring that Trump’s ambitions were a grave violation of international law.

In a related context, Netanyahu praised Trump’s rebuilding proposal during a Fox News interview, despite receiving criticism from Arab nations. He remarked, “This is the first sensible plan I’ve encountered, and it should be pursued seriously. It holds the potential to foster a new future for everyone.” After receiving pushback from American allies and Republican leaders regarding Trump’s ideas of U.S. governance over Gaza and resettling Palestinians, both the Secretary of State and Trump’s spokesperson attempted to moderate those views. Netanyahu spoke of a more voluntary and temporary relocation for Gazans, asking, “What’s wrong with allowing those who wish to leave to do so?”

Malaysia’s government expressed strong opposition to any plans that might result in the forced displacement of Palestinians. They issued a statement emphasizing that any unilateral steps that disregard Palestinian self-determination would be unacceptable and would only exacerbate ongoing conflicts. Predominantly Muslim Malaysia advocates for a sovereign Palestinian state along pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, while urging international backing for a two-state solution.

At the United Nations, the Palestinian ambassador welcomed the global backlash against Trump’s Gaza proposal, indicating that plans for an international conference in June are in the works to address the Israeli occupation of Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. Riyad Mansour emphasized that the Gaza Strip is a significant part of Palestinian heritage, stating, “No force can remove our people from their homeland.” He recalled the mass displacement of Palestinians in 1948 and expressed hope for a future in which they could return home. Mansour also invited all 193 U.N. member states to the forthcoming conference intended to reinforce the International Court of Justice’s ruling against the occupation.

The United Nations Secretary-General indicated that Trump’s proposal could equate to ethnic cleansing, stating that only a two-state solution could lead to true stability in the region. He emphasized the need to adhere to international law and expressed concern about any forced displacement, which he categorically deemed as ethnic cleansing. Guterres reiterated that sustainable peace necessitates the end of Israeli control over Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem. He moreover pointed to the significant dehumanization faced by the Palestinian people and the extensive destruction in Gaza, advocating for an enduring ceasefire along with the release of hostages taken during recent conflicts.

In a significant development, French President Emmanuel Macron reached out to Syria’s newly appointed interim leader, Ahmad al-Sharaa, inviting him to France in the near future. This invitation marks a pivotal movement in Syrian-Western relations following the overthrow of former President Bashar Assad. Macron emphasized France’s intention to lift sanctions on Syria to facilitate growth and recovery.

In response to Trump’s stance, Israel’s Foreign Minister announced the country would not engage with the U.N.’s top human rights body after Trump declared the U.S. withdrawal from it. This reflects Israel’s long-standing disillusionment with the council for its perceived biases against the nation. Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended Trump’s Gaza plans, labeling them a “generous” opportunity aimed at disaster recovery. He mentioned the dire conditions in Gaza due to unexploded ordnance and debris, implying that temporary housing would be necessary during the rebuilding phase.

German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier voiced significant concerns regarding any proposals suggesting the uprooting of Palestinians from Gaza, deeming them unacceptable per international law. He stressed that such ideas would not form a constructive basis for diplomatic talks and reiterated support for a two-state resolution. Similarly, the Arab League condemned Trump’s plan, stating it could lead to instability and rejected any notion of displacing Palestinians from Gaza, underscoring that the region is essential for any future Palestinian state.

While some Israelis have welcomed Trump’s proposal, with Netanyahu acknowledging their thinking aligned with Trump’s insights, many remain focused on humanitarian efforts. With uncertainties over future security and hostages, various leaders voiced support for a negotiated approach that fundamentally prioritizes Palestinian rights as part of a peaceful two-state resolution.

As countries around the world respond with various stances on Trump’s proposal, from outright condemnation to cautious endorsement, the overarching need for dialogue and a sustainable resolution remains vital in the face of ongoing conflict and turmoil.