KYIV, Ukraine — As part of its efforts to strengthen its armed forces, Ukraine is nearing the completion of reforms aimed at recruiting young individuals aged 18 to 25 who are currently exempt from military service. Colonel Pavlo Palisa, the recently appointed Deputy Head of the President’s Office and battlefield commander, emphasized in his first interview with international media that the outdated military draft system inherited from the Soviet era is impeding progress.
Despite Ukraine introducing a mobilization law last spring that reduced the conscription age from 27 to 25, the results have not sufficed to replenish troops or address the losses incurred on the battlefield during the ongoing conflict with Russia. Therefore, new recruitment strategies are being explored.
One proposed initiative is termed an “honest contract,” which would provide financial incentives, clearly defined training guarantees, and enhanced communication between soldiers and their commanders. This program primarily targets young Ukrainians aged 18-25 who are currently exempt from service, as well as those eligible for deferment or those discharged following the introduction of the mobilization law.
Palisa explained that the goal is to foster mutual understanding and professionalism in relationships between unit commanders and contract soldiers. He stated, “In my opinion, this is essential for effective dialogue.” This initiative aligns with discussions from both the Biden and Trump administrations that suggest Ukraine could bolster its military by lowering the age of conscription.
While President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has opposed compulsory mobilization for 18-year-olds, citing potential long-term consequences for the nation, Palisa advocates for starting an open conversation with society. He stresses that defending the nation is a collective responsibility that extends beyond just the armed forces.
Currently, Palisa’s office, alongside the Cabinet and the Ministry of Defense, is analyzing why previous mobilization efforts have not produced the expected results. He expressed confidence in Ukraine’s available mobilization resources, claiming they currently exceed the operational requirements on the front lines. However, he noted that the existing mechanisms are not enabling optimal effectiveness.
Palisa’s transition from the battlefield to the presidential office is viewed as a move to address critical systemic issues within the military structure. As a member of a new generation of Ukrainian military leadership, he was studying at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College during the early days of Russia’s full-scale invasion. He completed his studies remotely while engaged in combat and later commanded the 93rd Brigade “Kholodnyi Yar” during the arduous nine-month battle for Bakhmut.
Highlighting the unique nature of his position, Palisa believes it is crucial to bring significant military challenges to the forefront of national leadership. He intends to return to combat duties once his current responsibilities are fulfilled.
With Russian forces continuing to make slow gains in the Donetsk region, analysts have raised concerns regarding structural deficiencies in Ukraine’s command system and inadequate communication among units on the front lines. These weaknesses are seen as significant factors contributing to Ukraine’s difficulties in maintaining territorial integrity along the extensive 1,000 km (620 mile) front.
Over the course of the conflict, Ukraine’s military has expanded, yet the years of resistance have left little opportunity for strategic oversight. Palisa points to the urgent necessity for reforms that would enhance coordination and operational effectiveness.
He emphasized the need for adapting military structures to fit the demands of modern warfare, remarking, “This is what needs to be done. There is no other way.”