Katie Couric criticizes Kamala Harris for evasive interview responses

A blunt critique of Harris’ interviews

Katie Couric didn’t hold back in her assessment of Vice President Kamala Harris’ interview style during the election campaign, bluntly stating on her podcast, Next Question with Katie Couric, “Answer the god damn question.” Couric expressed frustration at Harris’ tendency to provide vague, meandering answers rather than direct responses to critical questions.

Missed opportunities on key issues

Couric highlighted specific moments where Harris could have delivered more pointed arguments, such as discussing Supreme Court ethics during a CNN town hall. Instead, Couric noted, Harris gave brief, disconnected responses that failed to address the core of the questions.

Criticism of Harris’ campaign strategy

Couric criticized Harris’ campaign team for not adequately preparing her for tough interviews, describing the lack of preparation as “crazy.” Couric argued that Harris missed opportunities to separate herself from the Biden administration and articulate her own vision, particularly during contentious moments like her appearance on The View, where Harris admitted, “nothing comes to mind” when asked how she would differ from President Biden.

Praise for rare moments of strength

Despite her critiques, Couric acknowledged that Harris performed better in challenging interviews, pointing to her exchange with Fox News’ Bret Baier as one of her stronger moments. Couric argued that tough questioning often brings out better responses from candidates, contrasting this with Harris’ lackluster performances when given easier questions.

Jen Psaki weighs in

Jen Psaki, former White House Press Secretary and guest on Couric’s podcast, noted that the election campaign was uniquely difficult for Harris due to Biden’s early departure from the race following a poor debate performance. Psaki described the political climate as fragile, suggesting it complicated Harris’ ability to establish a distinct identity.

A lesson in preparation

Couric emphasized the importance of thorough preparation for interviews, questioning why Harris’ campaign didn’t equip her with clear, concise responses to predictable questions. “If I were running for president,” Couric said, “I’d sit down with my braintrust and rehearse how to handle these questions.”

Broader backlash from liberal figures

Couric’s critique aligns with a broader shift among liberal commentators, including Charlamagne tha God, who have openly questioned Harris’ effectiveness as a candidate. Couric’s remarks reflect growing frustration with Harris’ campaign strategy and her inability to deliver decisive answers during pivotal moments.

Harris’ campaign struggles highlight the critical importance of preparation and clarity in connecting with voters, a lesson Couric believes should have been front and center throughout her run.