Key Point Summary โ Juror Jason Speaks
- Jason believed Read was entirely innocent
- He rejected the reasonable doubt argument
- Key evidence: functional taillight video
- Jurors struggled with gaps in the investigation
- He still doesnโt know how OโKeefe died
- Jury felt courthouse pressure but stayed firm
The dramatic Juror Jason speaks moment surfaced this week. Jason, known as Juror No.?4 in the Karen Read retrial, told TMZ he believes Read didnโt hit her boyfriendโand that sheโs fully innocent.
In a revealing chat, he laid bare how shaky evidence and cavernous investigative holes shaped the verdict. Now, the public watches, wondering who killed John OโKeefeโand whether justice slipped away.
Jury Shock and Division
Jason said he never bought the โreasonable doubtโ narrative. Instead, he felt certain Read did not collide with OโKeefeโcalling her verdict one of sincere innocence.
He described the jury as initially split: some felt she was clearly innocent, others leaned on acquittal due to doubt, and a few suspected guilt. But by the final vote, they were unanimous.
The Taillight That Sparked Doubt
Key to Jasonโs conviction was one videoโnot shaky evidence, but clear proof: Readโs SUV taillight still functioned after the alleged collision. That single piece of footage flipped the switch for him.
โIf she hit him, the taillight would have been broken,โ he explained. Then, doubt turned certainty.
Investigation in Tatters
Jason blamed the poor investigation for the case collapse. He noted simple mistakes: no CCTV, no crime scene logs, no witness interviews.
โAll those holes made us question everythingโand they couldnโt prove she collided with him,โ he said. He never saw direct proof tying Read to OโKeefeโs death.
Conspiracy Questions Linger
Defense claims included a cover-up theory: cops protecting their own and framing Read. Jason confessed he didnโt know if that was realโbut stressed the investigation looked โpoor.โ
He kept an open mind: maybe corruption happened. But either way, evidence was too weak.
How Did OโKeefe Die?
Since the jury verdict, Jason admits heโs still unsure how OโKeefe died. No alternate suspect appeared during testimony.
โWe have no clue what happened,โ he said. He couldnโt link Read to the fatal blowโand that was enough to acquit.
External Pressure Was Real
A crowd roared outside Norfolk courthouse as the jury deliberated. Jason said the fanfare weighed on them.
โIt made the pressure harder,โ he noted. Yet he insisted that emotion didnโt guide the verdictโthey stuck to facts.
Final Verdict: Innocent in Juryโs Eyes
Ultimately, Jason delivered a blunt conclusion: Read is innocent. He maintained that contention, not doubt, drove his vote.
To him, the true victim is John OโKeefeโwhose death remains unexplained. And while he feels guilty for the familyโs heartache, he believes justice prevailed where evidence couldnโt stand.
Outlook: What Comes Next?
Questions now swirl. Could the case reopen? Will the civil suit clarify the mystery? And can law enforcement restore trust?
Yet for Jason, the trial ends here. He stands by his decision. And the story isnโt overโfar from it.
