MANCHESTER, England — The U.K. government is introducing enhanced powers for a proposed soccer regulator to address concerns over “rogue owners and directors” and to prevent future attempts to create a breakaway Super League.

The Football Governance Bill aims to empower an independent regulator to protect the future of football clubs, particularly through stricter assessments regarding club ownership and management.

An updated version of the bill was presented to the House of Lords on Thursday, incorporating amendments that will require clubs to engage effectively with fans when it comes to decisions like modifying ticket prices or relocating stadiums.

This legislation seeks to ensure the financial viability of top-tier men’s soccer in England and to avert the collapse of community and cultural assets, an issue highlighted by the recent failures of lower-league teams such as Bury and Macclesfield.

The government has attributed these failures to “excessive and reckless risk-taking,” with numerous clubs operating far beyond their financial means.

Additionally, the bill seeks to prevent another breakaway scenario after a failed attempt in 2021 when twelve elite European clubs, including six from the Premier League, attempted to establish a Super League, a venture that quickly crumbled under heavy fan opposition.

Recognizing the critical moment for English football, the culture secretary emphasized the sport’s importance as a national treasure and a significant export that needs to flourish for future generations.

For a long time, financial uncertainty has jeopardized devoted fans and entire communities, leading to the potential loss of beloved clubs due to mismanagement and poor financial choices.

As part of the revisions to the original bill introduced by the preceding Conservative government, the independent regulator will also oversee the “parachute payments” made by the Premier League to assist teams that have been relegated.

In response to the proposed changes, the Premier League expressed its apprehensions about some powers afforded to the regulator.

While acknowledging that certain elements of the bill could enhance the strength of the English game, the league voiced concerns regarding the regulatory framework.

It raised alarms about the implications of having a rigid regulatory approach akin to banking and the untested authority of the regulator to intervene in the distribution of Premier League revenues, which could adversely affect the league’s competitiveness, club investments in top-tier talent, and the aspirations that bolster its global appeal and growth.

Another significant alteration indicates that the regulator will not need to consider government foreign and trade policies when sanctioning club acquisitions.

Further, the government has pledged a commitment to enhancing equality, diversity, and inclusion within the sport.