The Michigan Supreme Court recently overturned a 2006 murder conviction related to an infant’s death, citing new perspectives on shaken baby syndrome. Chazlee Lemons, currently serving a life sentence, is set to receive a new trial as her legal team enlisted scientific experts, leading to a change in the autopsy doctor’s view on the cause of the infant’s death nearly two decades ago.
The court indicated that there is a substantial possibility that a jury could have doubts about Lemons’ guilt. The decision was made through a 5-2 vote led by Justice Megan Cavanagh. Lemons was represented by the Innocence Clinic at the University of Michigan Law School, known for successfully challenging convictions in the past.
Lemons was accused of first-degree murder in the death of her infant, Nakita, who had a history of breathing issues. The prosecution’s case relied on autopsy findings and Lemons’ statements to law enforcement where she mentioned shaking the baby to stop her from crying.
During the original trial, Dr. Bader Cassin classified the death as shaken baby syndrome based on his autopsy, without any expert testimony presented to counter his opinion. However, in 2017, Cassin altered his stance suggesting that Nakita might have choked on formula and biomechanical evidence indicated shaking alone would not have caused the injuries.
Although the Supreme Court acknowledged Lemons’ initial statements incriminating her for shaking the infant, they pointed out the potential for false confessions under certain circumstances. The decision faced dissent from Justice Brian Zahra, who questioned the reliance on what he deemed unreliable evidence to favor Lemons.
The American Academy of Pediatrics supported the prosecution, cautioning against considering disputed scientific theories on head injuries and urging the court not to be swayed by such arguments. This development marks a significant turning point in the case that has been ongoing for years.
