Win $100-Register

Judge releases heavily edited evidence in Trump’s 2020 election meddling case


In a significant development related to Donald Trump’s alleged interference in the 2020 election, a judge has released a set of newly redacted documents. This disclosure, which took place on Friday, offers a glimpse into the evidence that prosecutors may use if the case progresses to trial. Approximately 1,900 pages of documentation, collected by special counsel Jack Smith’s investigative team, were previously filed under seal. This was done to assist U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in determining which allegations have the merit to move forward, especially following a Supreme Court ruling in July that granted extensive immunity to former presidents concerning actions taken in their official capacity.

The redacted documents made public primarily consist of materials that were largely known prior, such as screenshots of Trump’s social media posts regarding the 2020 election. Notably, the release included a transcript of a video statement Trump delivered on January 6, 2021, where he urged individuals involved in the Capitol riots to disperse, simultaneously telling them, “we love you” and describing them as “very special.” Most of the contents, however, were heavily obscured, suggesting that sensitive materials, including grand jury testimonies and other undisclosed information, remain protected due to the secrecy rules surrounding grand juries.

Other publicly accessible materials in the redacted release featured excerpts from a book by former Vice President Mike Pence, along with witness testimonies presented to the House committee investigating the January 6 events. Additionally, a transcript surfaced of Trump’s phone conversation in which he exerted pressure on Georgia election officials to “find” votes that would overturn his electoral defeat by Democrat Joe Biden in that state. There were also fundraising emails from Trump’s 2020 campaign alongside a letter from Pence to Congress dated January 6, where he expressed his inability to exercise “unilateral authority” regarding the counting of electoral votes.

These documents were part of a filing submitted as appendices to a 165-page brief that was unsealed earlier this month. This brief involved prosecutors unveiling new evidence against Trump to bolster their claim that he should not be granted immunity from prosecution. Trump’s legal team expressed concerns about releasing this information so close to the upcoming presidential election. However, Judge Chutkan declined their request to delay making these materials public until after the election, stating it would be inappropriate to consider the political timeline in her decision.

ALL Headlines