San Francisco authorities are set to implement new measures to remove homeless individuals from public spaces as part of Mayor London Breed’s efforts to tackle tent encampments more aggressively after a significant decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Despite the ongoing offering of housing and services to homeless individuals, city workers will now have increased authority to prevent tents from reappearing in cleared areas and to curb the expansion of encampments.
San Francisco, which has almost 4,000 shelter beds for an estimated 8,000 homeless individuals, has been ramping up capacity since 2018 under Mayor Breed’s administration but still faces shortages. The move aims to encourage individuals to accept shelter offers and understand that they cannot remain in their current locations once cleared out.
Following a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that enables cities to prohibit homeless encampments more easily, the issue has been arising in various parts of the country due to housing affordability challenges and the opioid crisis. In response, California Governor Gavin Newsom has directed state agencies to begin removing tents and structures on state-owned land.
In central California, despite objections from residents and advocates, the Fresno City Council has given initial approval for a ban on homeless camping. Even though San Francisco authorities continue to conduct regular encampment clearances with advance notice and outreach to homeless residents, new policies now allow for a stronger approach in preventing reoccupation. Breed has emphasized that services and shelter will still be offered, but enforcement will be progressive, starting with warnings and potentially leading to citations, penalties, or even arrests.
Despite the availability of hundreds of vacant subsidized housing units and hotel rooms, homeless advocates argue that the focus on encampment sweeps exacerbates the issue instead of providing long-term solutions. Officials in Los Angeles County have voiced disagreement with Governor Newsom’s approach, highlighting concerns that criminalization could hinder individuals’ paths to housing and contradict efforts to create a fairer system.
